<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Linux Mint 7 (XFCE)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://desktoplinuxreviews.com/2009/08/13/linux-mint-7-xfce/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://desktoplinuxreviews.com/2009/08/13/linux-mint-7-xfce/</link>
	<description>Find the best desktop Linux distributions and applications!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 04:48:15 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://desktoplinuxreviews.com/2009/08/13/linux-mint-7-xfce/comment-page-1/#comment-1098</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 07:27:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://desktoplinuxreviews.com/?p=618#comment-1098</guid>
		<description>I can&#039;t believe the reviewer, Jim Lynch, complains about there being no games in the distribution. What a stupid thing to say. Download the games you want. They are all available for every single linux distrubutions. Just click on the button in Synaptic (or the equivalent)! All the games, all the programmes are available for every single Linux distribution, so what the hell is the point of commenting on the presence or absence of any programme in particular?! A review should be focussed on the actual stability and overall functionality of the distrubution.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="comment-toolbar" style="text-align: right"><a href="#comment" onclick="CF_Reply('1098','Robert'); return false;">Reply</a>  |  <a href="#comment" onclick="CF_Quote('1098','Robert'); return false;">Quote</a></div><span id="co_1098"><p>I can&#8217;t believe the reviewer, Jim Lynch, complains about there being no games in the distribution. What a stupid thing to say. Download the games you want. They are all available for every single linux distrubutions. Just click on the button in Synaptic (or the equivalent)! All the games, all the programmes are available for every single Linux distribution, so what the hell is the point of commenting on the presence or absence of any programme in particular?! A review should be focussed on the actual stability and overall functionality of the distrubution.</p>
</span>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barney Rubble</title>
		<link>http://desktoplinuxreviews.com/2009/08/13/linux-mint-7-xfce/comment-page-1/#comment-1011</link>
		<dc:creator>Barney Rubble</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 19:45:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://desktoplinuxreviews.com/?p=618#comment-1011</guid>
		<description>KDE is too windows-ish?  Gnome is the DE that uses a registry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="comment-toolbar" style="text-align: right"><a href="#comment" onclick="CF_Reply('1011','Barney Rubble'); return false;">Reply</a>  |  <a href="#comment" onclick="CF_Quote('1011','Barney Rubble'); return false;">Quote</a></div><span id="co_1011"><p>KDE is too windows-ish?  Gnome is the DE that uses a registry.</p>
</span>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://desktoplinuxreviews.com/2009/08/13/linux-mint-7-xfce/comment-page-1/#comment-719</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2009 00:27:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://desktoplinuxreviews.com/?p=618#comment-719</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;@ &lt;a href=&quot;#comment-459&quot; title=&quot;Go to comment of this author&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Brian Masinick&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt;:

Brian, you like KDE over Gnome? I like Gnome better. KDE is too windows-ish.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="comment-toolbar" style="text-align: right"><a href="#comment" onclick="CF_Reply('719','Nick'); return false;">Reply</a>  |  <a href="#comment" onclick="CF_Quote('719','Nick'); return false;">Quote</a></div><span id="co_719"><p><b>@ <a href="#comment-459" title="Go to comment of this author" rel="nofollow">Brian Masinick</a></b>:</p>
<p>Brian, you like KDE over Gnome? I like Gnome better. KDE is too windows-ish.</p>
</span>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dragonmouth</title>
		<link>http://desktoplinuxreviews.com/2009/08/13/linux-mint-7-xfce/comment-page-1/#comment-532</link>
		<dc:creator>dragonmouth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2009 11:28:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://desktoplinuxreviews.com/?p=618#comment-532</guid>
		<description>In your reviews you keep using a nebulous term &quot;older hardware.&quot;  For some, like me, &quot;older&quot; means Pentium Pro or a PII.  For others, last year&#039;s  Phantom may be considered &quot;older hardware.&quot;  I do realize that you do not have the facilities or the time to test a distro on more than one PC to narrow down the usability threshold.  So, please try to avoid using vague terms in your reviews.

I know you like virtualization.  It&#039;s a brand new, shiny toy for you to play with.   It makes it much easier to check out various distros.  However, it adds another layer of software that may possibly introduce errors into your tests. While I do not write reviews, I do check out a lot of distros looking for that &quot;perfect&quot; one.  I use a removable HD rack with a drive dedicated specifically to testing Linux distros.

BTW - I have used Mint 6, sidux, Mepis, Sabayon 4.0 on &quot;older hardware&quot; such as P3 500mhz with 256meg RAM.  While not head-snapping fast, I had no complaints about their speed in daily use.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="comment-toolbar" style="text-align: right"><a href="#comment" onclick="CF_Reply('532','dragonmouth'); return false;">Reply</a>  |  <a href="#comment" onclick="CF_Quote('532','dragonmouth'); return false;">Quote</a></div><span id="co_532"><p>In your reviews you keep using a nebulous term &#8220;older hardware.&#8221;  For some, like me, &#8220;older&#8221; means Pentium Pro or a PII.  For others, last year&#8217;s  Phantom may be considered &#8220;older hardware.&#8221;  I do realize that you do not have the facilities or the time to test a distro on more than one PC to narrow down the usability threshold.  So, please try to avoid using vague terms in your reviews.</p>
<p>I know you like virtualization.  It&#8217;s a brand new, shiny toy for you to play with.   It makes it much easier to check out various distros.  However, it adds another layer of software that may possibly introduce errors into your tests. While I do not write reviews, I do check out a lot of distros looking for that &#8220;perfect&#8221; one.  I use a removable HD rack with a drive dedicated specifically to testing Linux distros.</p>
<p>BTW &#8211; I have used Mint 6, sidux, Mepis, Sabayon 4.0 on &#8220;older hardware&#8221; such as P3 500mhz with 256meg RAM.  While not head-snapping fast, I had no complaints about their speed in daily use.</p>
</span>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Evans</title>
		<link>http://desktoplinuxreviews.com/2009/08/13/linux-mint-7-xfce/comment-page-1/#comment-468</link>
		<dc:creator>Evans</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 10:47:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://desktoplinuxreviews.com/?p=618#comment-468</guid>
		<description>This is something I might think of trying. I already run Ubuntu on the desktop and also have another decommissioned computer with less memory which I intend trying it on. If it works on that, then I will have to wait till the final version is out before rolling it on the much faster computer.

Will leave a comment here later to let you know how it goes.

Nice review BTW :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="comment-toolbar" style="text-align: right"><a href="#comment" onclick="CF_Reply('468','Evans'); return false;">Reply</a>  |  <a href="#comment" onclick="CF_Quote('468','Evans'); return false;">Quote</a></div><span id="co_468"><p>This is something I might think of trying. I already run Ubuntu on the desktop and also have another decommissioned computer with less memory which I intend trying it on. If it works on that, then I will have to wait till the final version is out before rolling it on the much faster computer.</p>
<p>Will leave a comment here later to let you know how it goes.</p>
<p>Nice review BTW :)</p>
</span>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nikhil Sinha</title>
		<link>http://desktoplinuxreviews.com/2009/08/13/linux-mint-7-xfce/comment-page-1/#comment-460</link>
		<dc:creator>Nikhil Sinha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 02:36:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://desktoplinuxreviews.com/?p=618#comment-460</guid>
		<description>I am looking forward to Linux Mint 7 XFCE. I am currently using Linux Mint 7 (Gnome) and it very good experience. 
I believe my laptop and my friends computer which has only 256 MB of RAM will be able to run Linux Mint 7 XFCE.

No XFCE has hard disk mounting facility, you review show some solution about the same.

Thanks for the good insight.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="comment-toolbar" style="text-align: right"><a href="#comment" onclick="CF_Reply('460','Nikhil Sinha'); return false;">Reply</a>  |  <a href="#comment" onclick="CF_Quote('460','Nikhil Sinha'); return false;">Quote</a></div><span id="co_460"><p>I am looking forward to Linux Mint 7 XFCE. I am currently using Linux Mint 7 (Gnome) and it very good experience.<br />
I believe my laptop and my friends computer which has only 256 MB of RAM will be able to run Linux Mint 7 XFCE.</p>
<p>No XFCE has hard disk mounting facility, you review show some solution about the same.</p>
<p>Thanks for the good insight.</p>
</span>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Masinick</title>
		<link>http://desktoplinuxreviews.com/2009/08/13/linux-mint-7-xfce/comment-page-1/#comment-459</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Masinick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 01:37:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://desktoplinuxreviews.com/?p=618#comment-459</guid>
		<description>Jim, of all of the Mint releases, this is the one I would be most likely to test next (until Mint gets KDE 4.3 or 4.4, then I may check that out too).  Concerning memory requirements, KDE 4.3 on sidux actually works with 256 MB memory, but it is not very responsive with that amount.  512 MB of memory, or perhaps 384 MB, would be more realistic values.  Based on that, I would suggest that 256 MB on an XFCE based system would be quite adequate, given that I am running sidux XFCE right now, and htop reveals ONLY 211 MB of memory in use, in spite of Seamonkey browser and Email, plus Google Chrome (being used now) are actively in use.

Sounds like this release may not be quite ready, but it does seem to be promising, and it may be worth a look some time soon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="comment-toolbar" style="text-align: right"><a href="#comment" onclick="CF_Reply('459','Brian Masinick'); return false;">Reply</a>  |  <a href="#comment" onclick="CF_Quote('459','Brian Masinick'); return false;">Quote</a></div><span id="co_459"><p>Jim, of all of the Mint releases, this is the one I would be most likely to test next (until Mint gets KDE 4.3 or 4.4, then I may check that out too).  Concerning memory requirements, KDE 4.3 on sidux actually works with 256 MB memory, but it is not very responsive with that amount.  512 MB of memory, or perhaps 384 MB, would be more realistic values.  Based on that, I would suggest that 256 MB on an XFCE based system would be quite adequate, given that I am running sidux XFCE right now, and htop reveals ONLY 211 MB of memory in use, in spite of Seamonkey browser and Email, plus Google Chrome (being used now) are actively in use.</p>
<p>Sounds like this release may not be quite ready, but it does seem to be promising, and it may be worth a look some time soon.</p>
</span>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
