<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fedora Linux 12</title>
	<atom:link href="http://desktoplinuxreviews.com/2009/11/30/fedora-12/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://desktoplinuxreviews.com/2009/11/30/fedora-12/</link>
	<description>Find the best desktop Linux distros!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 16:33:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lanzamiento de distribución : Fedora 13 &#171; Gustavo Pimentel&#39;s GNU/Linux blog</title>
		<link>http://desktoplinuxreviews.com/2009/11/30/fedora-12/comment-page-2/#comment-1549</link>
		<dc:creator>Lanzamiento de distribución : Fedora 13 &#171; Gustavo Pimentel&#39;s GNU/Linux blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 May 2010 17:59:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://desktoplinuxreviews.com/?p=1148#comment-1549</guid>
		<description>[...] FRLinux (French) • Dedoimedo • MakeUseOf • Adventures in Open Source • Desktop Linux Reviews • Pro-Linux (German) • Lin Magazine (Hebrew) • DistroWatch • The Register • Heise Open [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] FRLinux (French) • Dedoimedo • MakeUseOf • Adventures in Open Source • Desktop Linux Reviews • Pro-Linux (German) • Lin Magazine (Hebrew) • DistroWatch • The Register • Heise Open [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kronics</title>
		<link>http://desktoplinuxreviews.com/2009/11/30/fedora-12/comment-page-2/#comment-1123</link>
		<dc:creator>kronics</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Apr 2010 06:01:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://desktoplinuxreviews.com/?p=1148#comment-1123</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;@ &lt;a href=&quot;#comment-984&quot; title=&quot;Go to comment of this author&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Dennis Schafroth&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt;:Ok. I really like to boot my GUI root. Why can&#039;t I do that with Fedora 12? Another thing..., Nexuiz game does not work with Fedora 12?? what&#039;s up ?? Disappointed now. I have been faithfull to Red Hat for along time. It&#039;s time to find another Distro. Sadly</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>@ <a href="#comment-984" title="Go to comment of this author">Dennis Schafroth</a></b>:Ok. I really like to boot my GUI root. Why can&#8217;t I do that with Fedora 12? Another thing&#8230;, Nexuiz game does not work with Fedora 12?? what&#8217;s up ?? Disappointed now. I have been faithfull to Red Hat for along time. It&#8217;s time to find another Distro. Sadly</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jellmoo</title>
		<link>http://desktoplinuxreviews.com/2009/11/30/fedora-12/comment-page-2/#comment-1013</link>
		<dc:creator>Jellmoo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 04:56:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://desktoplinuxreviews.com/?p=1148#comment-1013</guid>
		<description>Personally, I&#039;m excited to see what we get when the KDE and XFCE Community editions of Mint come out. The 7 versions were really high quality, so the bar is set pretty darn high.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personally, I&#8217;m excited to see what we get when the KDE and XFCE Community editions of Mint come out. The 7 versions were really high quality, so the bar is set pretty darn high.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: masinick</title>
		<link>http://desktoplinuxreviews.com/2009/11/30/fedora-12/comment-page-2/#comment-1012</link>
		<dc:creator>masinick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 04:14:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://desktoplinuxreviews.com/?p=1148#comment-1012</guid>
		<description>Thought we&#039;d see the Linux Mint review by now... oh well.  Jim, tell us all about Linux Mint and how it fails to include the new, improved Google Chrome and how you have little else to complain about!  ;-)

Expecting Mint to be another good one as long as Clem shuts up and sticks to writing great software.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thought we&#8217;d see the Linux Mint review by now&#8230; oh well.  Jim, tell us all about Linux Mint and how it fails to include the new, improved Google Chrome and how you have little else to complain about!  ;-)</p>
<p>Expecting Mint to be another good one as long as Clem shuts up and sticks to writing great software.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas</title>
		<link>http://desktoplinuxreviews.com/2009/11/30/fedora-12/comment-page-1/#comment-1008</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 19:41:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://desktoplinuxreviews.com/?p=1148#comment-1008</guid>
		<description>I tried to upgrade Fedora to Fedora 12 and it did not work.  I had to redo a fresh install over my Fedora partition.  I also found my Fedora 12 install to make other OSs unbootable in seperate partitions, grub would not boot other OSs.  I fresh install of Ubuntu after installing Fedora fix everything.  I also found no why to report bugs like Ubuntu now has. Fedora 12 has the &quot;Automatic Bug Reporting Tool&quot; but that is for crashes not bugs.  I have found numerous bugs so far in Fedora 12.  However, I still like Fedora 12 when things work they work very very good in Fedora 12.  I just wish Fedora would better compete with Ubuntu.  Fedora is a very good OS I have been using it on servers since 2001 and it has as good of up time as Sun Solaris except it&#039;s easier to use still some work to get it as simple as Ubuntu my current favorite OS. :smile:</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I tried to upgrade Fedora to Fedora 12 and it did not work.  I had to redo a fresh install over my Fedora partition.  I also found my Fedora 12 install to make other OSs unbootable in seperate partitions, grub would not boot other OSs.  I fresh install of Ubuntu after installing Fedora fix everything.  I also found no why to report bugs like Ubuntu now has. Fedora 12 has the &#8220;Automatic Bug Reporting Tool&#8221; but that is for crashes not bugs.  I have found numerous bugs so far in Fedora 12.  However, I still like Fedora 12 when things work they work very very good in Fedora 12.  I just wish Fedora would better compete with Ubuntu.  Fedora is a very good OS I have been using it on servers since 2001 and it has as good of up time as Sun Solaris except it&#8217;s easier to use still some work to get it as simple as Ubuntu my current favorite OS. <img src='http://desktoplinuxreviews.com/wp-content/plugins/smilies-themer/Nomicons v2.0/smile.png' alt=':smile:' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jellmoo</title>
		<link>http://desktoplinuxreviews.com/2009/11/30/fedora-12/comment-page-1/#comment-1002</link>
		<dc:creator>Jellmoo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 19:05:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://desktoplinuxreviews.com/?p=1148#comment-1002</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m giving the XFCE and LXDE spins a go in a virtual machine at the moment, and I have to say that they are impressive, especially the LXDE one. I usually prefer XFCE, but this is the sharpest looking LXDE desktop I&#039;ve seen so far. Both are definitely worth a look.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m giving the XFCE and LXDE spins a go in a virtual machine at the moment, and I have to say that they are impressive, especially the LXDE one. I usually prefer XFCE, but this is the sharpest looking LXDE desktop I&#8217;ve seen so far. Both are definitely worth a look.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: izbobs</title>
		<link>http://desktoplinuxreviews.com/2009/11/30/fedora-12/comment-page-1/#comment-999</link>
		<dc:creator>izbobs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 12:08:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://desktoplinuxreviews.com/?p=1148#comment-999</guid>
		<description>I had also sorts of trouble getting nvidia drivers working, bricked the pc several times before getting it to work.  Found a quick solution, http://easylifeproject.org/ it does most of the hard work for you!  worked a treat.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had also sorts of trouble getting nvidia drivers working, bricked the pc several times before getting it to work.  Found a quick solution, <a href="http://easylifeproject.org/">http://easylifeproject.org/</a> it does most of the hard work for you!  worked a treat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Masinick</title>
		<link>http://desktoplinuxreviews.com/2009/11/30/fedora-12/comment-page-1/#comment-992</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Masinick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 02:08:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://desktoplinuxreviews.com/?p=1148#comment-992</guid>
		<description>For what it is worth, one of our relative newcomers over at USALUG recently started using Linux with SLAX, but he reported this week that he successfully installed and is using Fedora 12, so it certainly is not difficult for a newcomer to install, so in the interest of balancing my earlier comments, and to provide a bit of substance to what Jim has said, some relative novices may enjoy using it, especially if they are content to run nearly all free software.

That was good news to hear this week.

Thanks again for the review.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For what it is worth, one of our relative newcomers over at USALUG recently started using Linux with SLAX, but he reported this week that he successfully installed and is using Fedora 12, so it certainly is not difficult for a newcomer to install, so in the interest of balancing my earlier comments, and to provide a bit of substance to what Jim has said, some relative novices may enjoy using it, especially if they are content to run nearly all free software.</p>
<p>That was good news to hear this week.</p>
<p>Thanks again for the review.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://desktoplinuxreviews.com/2009/11/30/fedora-12/comment-page-1/#comment-989</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 18:45:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://desktoplinuxreviews.com/?p=1148#comment-989</guid>
		<description>I love fedora12 it runs like a dream i downloaded GNOME live cd installed and then installed KDE an LXDE from add/remove software,What people should know that they need to go to http://rpmfusion.org/ and add thier repositories
the free and non-free ones and then the wonderful easylife for fedora
http://easylifeproject.org/ :cheerful:</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love fedora12 it runs like a dream i downloaded GNOME live cd installed and then installed KDE an LXDE from add/remove software,What people should know that they need to go to <a href="http://rpmfusion.org/">http://rpmfusion.org/</a> and add thier repositories<br />
the free and non-free ones and then the wonderful easylife for fedora<br />
<a href="http://easylifeproject.org/">http://easylifeproject.org/</a> <img src='http://desktoplinuxreviews.com/wp-content/plugins/smilies-themer/Nomicons v2.0/cheerful.png' alt=':cheerful:' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: P3tsl4ck</title>
		<link>http://desktoplinuxreviews.com/2009/11/30/fedora-12/comment-page-1/#comment-988</link>
		<dc:creator>P3tsl4ck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 18:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://desktoplinuxreviews.com/?p=1148#comment-988</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s a good distro for newbies users. But the main point here is that Fedora has turned into the new XZ compression packages...and Slackware was the first Linux distro to turn into XZ (LMZA) compression... Follow Slackware and someday it will be a high-level distro, perhaps.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s a good distro for newbies users. But the main point here is that Fedora has turned into the new XZ compression packages&#8230;and Slackware was the first Linux distro to turn into XZ (LMZA) compression&#8230; Follow Slackware and someday it will be a high-level distro, perhaps.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steonet</title>
		<link>http://desktoplinuxreviews.com/2009/11/30/fedora-12/comment-page-1/#comment-986</link>
		<dc:creator>steonet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 00:25:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://desktoplinuxreviews.com/?p=1148#comment-986</guid>
		<description>Fedora is a good distro but you need to install manually the Flash plugin and the &quot;libdvdcss&quot;.If a beginner wants to try Fedora I suggest this &quot;installation guide&quot;:
http://www.mjmwired.net/resources/mjm-fedora-f12.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fedora is a good distro but you need to install manually the Flash plugin and the &#8220;libdvdcss&#8221;.If a beginner wants to try Fedora I suggest this &#8220;installation guide&#8221;:<br />
<a href="http://www.mjmwired.net/resources/mjm-fedora-f12.html">http://www.mjmwired.net/resources/mjm-fedora-f12.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Masinick</title>
		<link>http://desktoplinuxreviews.com/2009/11/30/fedora-12/comment-page-1/#comment-985</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Masinick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 00:00:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://desktoplinuxreviews.com/?p=1148#comment-985</guid>
		<description>Jim, I think that Fedora has great software, and it is particularly useful for those who fall into one of these categories: 1) enterprise user who is evaluating future Red Hat Enterprise Linux releases and wants to help make them as solid as possible. 2) Free software enthusiast who wants a pure, or as close to pure, Linux experience as possible; Fedora delivers. 3) Those who want to use or evaluate the very latest in Security Enhanced Linux (SELinux) features.  Fedora leads here as well. 4) Those who want the latest virtualization features; again Fedora is a leader.

I cannot, however, recommend any Fedora release to a beginner unless they are a self driven beginner.  The Free Software stance alone is enough to keep people away.  I am sure that Adam will howl about this, but the last couple of releases, while very much leading edge, have not been the models of stability or ease of installation because there have been a number of impediments that a large number of people have complained about.

That does not make Fedora (any version) a lousy release; it is a leader in quite a few respects, as I have highlighted.  I just think it is best for the experienced user, one who will use it, test it, evaluate it, and report back on findings.  I have done so many times in the past; unfortunately for me, this is not one of those times, for I feel it does require an investment in time, both to take advantage of it, scope out potential issues and their solutions, report defects to help improve it, etc., and right now, I just cannot devote much time to those things.

I wouldn&#039;t push people away from Fedora, but I would hesitate to recommend it to a beginner without at least bringing up its strengths and weaknesses.  It has a LOT of strengths; it has a few weaknesses - the cutting edge nature sometimes reveals things unexpected that the user community finds after release.  Based on my own experiences with Fedora 7,8,9,10, and 11, (I think I liked 7 and 10 best, but had a horror of an experience with 11 Final after a great initial Live experience with 11 Alpha), I would leave this one to the veterans.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jim, I think that Fedora has great software, and it is particularly useful for those who fall into one of these categories: 1) enterprise user who is evaluating future Red Hat Enterprise Linux releases and wants to help make them as solid as possible. 2) Free software enthusiast who wants a pure, or as close to pure, Linux experience as possible; Fedora delivers. 3) Those who want to use or evaluate the very latest in Security Enhanced Linux (SELinux) features.  Fedora leads here as well. 4) Those who want the latest virtualization features; again Fedora is a leader.</p>
<p>I cannot, however, recommend any Fedora release to a beginner unless they are a self driven beginner.  The Free Software stance alone is enough to keep people away.  I am sure that Adam will howl about this, but the last couple of releases, while very much leading edge, have not been the models of stability or ease of installation because there have been a number of impediments that a large number of people have complained about.</p>
<p>That does not make Fedora (any version) a lousy release; it is a leader in quite a few respects, as I have highlighted.  I just think it is best for the experienced user, one who will use it, test it, evaluate it, and report back on findings.  I have done so many times in the past; unfortunately for me, this is not one of those times, for I feel it does require an investment in time, both to take advantage of it, scope out potential issues and their solutions, report defects to help improve it, etc., and right now, I just cannot devote much time to those things.</p>
<p>I wouldn&#8217;t push people away from Fedora, but I would hesitate to recommend it to a beginner without at least bringing up its strengths and weaknesses.  It has a LOT of strengths; it has a few weaknesses &#8211; the cutting edge nature sometimes reveals things unexpected that the user community finds after release.  Based on my own experiences with Fedora 7,8,9,10, and 11, (I think I liked 7 and 10 best, but had a horror of an experience with 11 Final after a great initial Live experience with 11 Alpha), I would leave this one to the veterans.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dennis Schafroth</title>
		<link>http://desktoplinuxreviews.com/2009/11/30/fedora-12/comment-page-1/#comment-984</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis Schafroth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 21:43:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://desktoplinuxreviews.com/?p=1148#comment-984</guid>
		<description>Fedora has been my distribution for my servers since FC1, but sadly they have dropped support for Via C3 in F12. Looking for an alternative...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fedora has been my distribution for my servers since FC1, but sadly they have dropped support for Via C3 in F12. Looking for an alternative&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Williamson</title>
		<link>http://desktoplinuxreviews.com/2009/11/30/fedora-12/comment-page-1/#comment-983</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Williamson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 20:07:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://desktoplinuxreviews.com/?p=1148#comment-983</guid>
		<description>Install speed from the live CD is very fast because it&#039;s just cloning a filesystem image - the same one the live environment uses - onto your hard disk. Installation from the traditional installer (DVD, or a net install) will be somewhat slower, as it actually installs a whole set of RPM packages as you&#039;d expect.

The live CD is somewhat light on software because of space issues. Fedora ships a very large range of languages on its live CDs which reduces the space available for software, so there isn&#039;t room for OO.o. For F13 we&#039;re probably going to introduce a 1GB or 2GB size live spin, which you could burn to a DVD or write to a USB stick. That will allow us to include software that doesn&#039;t fit on the current live images.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Install speed from the live CD is very fast because it&#8217;s just cloning a filesystem image &#8211; the same one the live environment uses &#8211; onto your hard disk. Installation from the traditional installer (DVD, or a net install) will be somewhat slower, as it actually installs a whole set of RPM packages as you&#8217;d expect.</p>
<p>The live CD is somewhat light on software because of space issues. Fedora ships a very large range of languages on its live CDs which reduces the space available for software, so there isn&#8217;t room for OO.o. For F13 we&#8217;re probably going to introduce a 1GB or 2GB size live spin, which you could burn to a DVD or write to a USB stick. That will allow us to include software that doesn&#8217;t fit on the current live images.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jellmoo</title>
		<link>http://desktoplinuxreviews.com/2009/11/30/fedora-12/comment-page-1/#comment-981</link>
		<dc:creator>Jellmoo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 18:39:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://desktoplinuxreviews.com/?p=1148#comment-981</guid>
		<description>My one issue is the recommendation to beginners. While the tech oriented will be able to add the RPMfusion repo and acquire multimedia codecs as well as video drivers, the system is not intuitive to those un-familiar with Linux in general.

Don&#039;t get me wrong, I like Fedora in theory (though I hate their package management), but there are many distros ahead of Fedora that I would recommend to beginners.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My one issue is the recommendation to beginners. While the tech oriented will be able to add the RPMfusion repo and acquire multimedia codecs as well as video drivers, the system is not intuitive to those un-familiar with Linux in general.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t get me wrong, I like Fedora in theory (though I hate their package management), but there are many distros ahead of Fedora that I would recommend to beginners.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tlmck</title>
		<link>http://desktoplinuxreviews.com/2009/11/30/fedora-12/comment-page-1/#comment-980</link>
		<dc:creator>tlmck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 17:50:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://desktoplinuxreviews.com/?p=1148#comment-980</guid>
		<description>Ran Gnome version in VM Ware Player under Vista. It did install in about 5 minutes. Only minor hickup was when it gave me an error and said it had to &quot;reinitialize&quot; the hard disk. I said OK and install proceeded without a hitch. I use VM Ware Player exclusively now as I am able to change video resolutions at will. Virtual Box still has not figured this out yet. I am running VM&#039;s at my laptops native 1280x800 res. regardless of distro.

Running the Gnome LiveCD right now on the laptop. Wireless had to be set up manually, but it did work(Atheros). I also like the fact that it includes only the essentials. I can do all the photo work I need on Gthumb, including light editing. All I had to add was Gnumeric, K3B, and Wine. It still makes me wonder though, with such a minimal compliment of preinstalls, how did they still get to 694mb? 

Oh well, still a very fine effort. It seems as if Fedora is finally getting in the game. Ubuntu should be very worried. I for one, am switching to Fedora on my desktop machine, and will run it in VM on the laptop under Vista until I can do a bit more stand alone testing. After that, it may replace Vista on the laptop. Unfortunately Ubuntu has lost me with their failure to support my laptop video and other oddities since version 9.04. They finally got wireless right, but that is about all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ran Gnome version in VM Ware Player under Vista. It did install in about 5 minutes. Only minor hickup was when it gave me an error and said it had to &#8220;reinitialize&#8221; the hard disk. I said OK and install proceeded without a hitch. I use VM Ware Player exclusively now as I am able to change video resolutions at will. Virtual Box still has not figured this out yet. I am running VM&#8217;s at my laptops native 1280&#215;800 res. regardless of distro.</p>
<p>Running the Gnome LiveCD right now on the laptop. Wireless had to be set up manually, but it did work(Atheros). I also like the fact that it includes only the essentials. I can do all the photo work I need on Gthumb, including light editing. All I had to add was Gnumeric, K3B, and Wine. It still makes me wonder though, with such a minimal compliment of preinstalls, how did they still get to 694mb? </p>
<p>Oh well, still a very fine effort. It seems as if Fedora is finally getting in the game. Ubuntu should be very worried. I for one, am switching to Fedora on my desktop machine, and will run it in VM on the laptop under Vista until I can do a bit more stand alone testing. After that, it may replace Vista on the laptop. Unfortunately Ubuntu has lost me with their failure to support my laptop video and other oddities since version 9.04. They finally got wireless right, but that is about all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dragonbite</title>
		<link>http://desktoplinuxreviews.com/2009/11/30/fedora-12/comment-page-1/#comment-978</link>
		<dc:creator>dragonbite</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 14:25:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://desktoplinuxreviews.com/?p=1148#comment-978</guid>
		<description>I installed Fedora 12 KDE and it&#039;s been working nicely.  It included KOffice 1.6 instead of OpenOffice or Abiword.

It should come as no surprise that Flash and DVDs don&#039;t work out-of-the-box as with most major Linux distributions they cannot (legally) include these pieces.  It takes a moment to install it, but it isn&#039;t a killer.

On the plus side, my Broadcom wireless card was recognized and available out-of-the-box in Fedora 12!  A First!  No need to use fwcutter or anything to slice-and-dice the proprietary drivers!  This alone is a feature I hope the other distributions include!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I installed Fedora 12 KDE and it&#8217;s been working nicely.  It included KOffice 1.6 instead of OpenOffice or Abiword.</p>
<p>It should come as no surprise that Flash and DVDs don&#8217;t work out-of-the-box as with most major Linux distributions they cannot (legally) include these pieces.  It takes a moment to install it, but it isn&#8217;t a killer.</p>
<p>On the plus side, my Broadcom wireless card was recognized and available out-of-the-box in Fedora 12!  A First!  No need to use fwcutter or anything to slice-and-dice the proprietary drivers!  This alone is a feature I hope the other distributions include!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: claudecat</title>
		<link>http://desktoplinuxreviews.com/2009/11/30/fedora-12/comment-page-1/#comment-976</link>
		<dc:creator>claudecat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 12:13:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://desktoplinuxreviews.com/?p=1148#comment-976</guid>
		<description>FWIW, I have had problems with the last 2 Fedora releases on my Compaq Presario (Athlon/nvidia). For me, if I can&#039;t make Compiz work AT ALL, then a distro isn&#039;t up to snuff. OTOH, Fedora works great on my Dell Latitude D810 with Intel video. I guess it&#039;s just a matter of proprietary drivers but c&#039;mon... I LOVED Fedora 10 (that blue flaming globe during startup ruled!) and Compiz worked on it once I jumped through a few hoops... why not now? It took me hours to even get the nvidia drivers installed on f12, only to find that Compiz either white-screens or leaves you without titlebars. I know this is off topic... sorry... as a final digression I&#039;ll just mention how much I despise grub2.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FWIW, I have had problems with the last 2 Fedora releases on my Compaq Presario (Athlon/nvidia). For me, if I can&#8217;t make Compiz work AT ALL, then a distro isn&#8217;t up to snuff. OTOH, Fedora works great on my Dell Latitude D810 with Intel video. I guess it&#8217;s just a matter of proprietary drivers but c&#8217;mon&#8230; I LOVED Fedora 10 (that blue flaming globe during startup ruled!) and Compiz worked on it once I jumped through a few hoops&#8230; why not now? It took me hours to even get the nvidia drivers installed on f12, only to find that Compiz either white-screens or leaves you without titlebars. I know this is off topic&#8230; sorry&#8230; as a final digression I&#8217;ll just mention how much I despise grub2.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: COrMan</title>
		<link>http://desktoplinuxreviews.com/2009/11/30/fedora-12/comment-page-1/#comment-975</link>
		<dc:creator>COrMan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 02:06:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://desktoplinuxreviews.com/?p=1148#comment-975</guid>
		<description>How is it with netbooks? I saw on the website that it has optimizations for Atom processors.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How is it with netbooks? I saw on the website that it has optimizations for Atom processors.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Served from: desktoplinuxreviews.com @ 2012-05-23 06:44:42 by W3 Total Cache -->
