<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ubuntu Linux 10.04 LTS (Lucid Lynx)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://desktoplinuxreviews.com/2010/04/29/ubuntu-linux-10-04-lucid-lynx/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://desktoplinuxreviews.com/2010/04/29/ubuntu-linux-10-04-lucid-lynx/</link>
	<description>Find the best desktop Linux distros!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 06:44:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ubuntu 10 04 desktop - TECHNOLOGY GADGETS &#8211; TECHNOLOGY GADGETS</title>
		<link>http://desktoplinuxreviews.com/2010/04/29/ubuntu-linux-10-04-lucid-lynx/comment-page-7/#comment-23341</link>
		<dc:creator>ubuntu 10 04 desktop - TECHNOLOGY GADGETS &#8211; TECHNOLOGY GADGETS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2011 21:04:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://desktoplinuxreviews.com/?p=1483#comment-23341</guid>
		<description>[...] world has been eagerly anticipating the final release of Ubuntu Linux 10.04, and now it?s &#8230;http://desktoplinuxreviews.com ..Ubuntu 10.04.3 LTS (Lucid Lynx)This directory contains the most frequently downloaded Ubuntu [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] world has been eagerly anticipating the final release of Ubuntu Linux 10.04, and now it?s &#8230;<a href="http://desktoplinuxreviews.com">http://desktoplinuxreviews.com</a> ..Ubuntu 10.04.3 LTS (Lucid Lynx)This directory contains the most frequently downloaded Ubuntu [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Torin</title>
		<link>http://desktoplinuxreviews.com/2010/04/29/ubuntu-linux-10-04-lucid-lynx/comment-page-7/#comment-16184</link>
		<dc:creator>Torin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2011 12:10:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://desktoplinuxreviews.com/?p=1483#comment-16184</guid>
		<description>I am considering going back to Ubuntu 10.04 LTS from 11.04. I don&#039;t like Unity. Lucid Lynx will be supported until April 2013 and is surely rock solid right now since it is out more than 12 months.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="comment-toolbar" style="text-align: right"><a href="#comment" onclick="CF_Reply('16184','Torin'); return false;">Reply</a>  |  <a href="#comment" onclick="CF_Quote('16184','Torin'); return false;">Quote</a></div><span id="co_16184"><p>I am considering going back to Ubuntu 10.04 LTS from 11.04. I don&#8217;t like Unity. Lucid Lynx will be supported until April 2013 and is surely rock solid right now since it is out more than 12 months.</p>
</span>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ubuntu Muslim Edition 10.04 (Sabily) Review &#124; Desktop Linux Reviews</title>
		<link>http://desktoplinuxreviews.com/2010/04/29/ubuntu-linux-10-04-lucid-lynx/comment-page-7/#comment-2595</link>
		<dc:creator>Ubuntu Muslim Edition 10.04 (Sabily) Review &#124; Desktop Linux Reviews</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Sep 2010 18:23:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://desktoplinuxreviews.com/?p=1483#comment-2595</guid>
		<description>[...] Related Posts:Ubuntu Linux 10.04 LTS (Lucid Lynx) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Related Posts:Ubuntu Linux 10.04 LTS (Lucid Lynx) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ubuntu Satanic Edition 10.04 (Lucifer's Legion) &#124; Desktop Linux Reviews</title>
		<link>http://desktoplinuxreviews.com/2010/04/29/ubuntu-linux-10-04-lucid-lynx/comment-page-7/#comment-2020</link>
		<dc:creator>Ubuntu Satanic Edition 10.04 (Lucifer's Legion) &#124; Desktop Linux Reviews</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jul 2010 15:35:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://desktoplinuxreviews.com/?p=1483#comment-2020</guid>
		<description>[...] Related Posts:Ubuntu Linux 10.04 LTS (Lucid Lynx) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Related Posts:Ubuntu Linux 10.04 LTS (Lucid Lynx) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alvin</title>
		<link>http://desktoplinuxreviews.com/2010/04/29/ubuntu-linux-10-04-lucid-lynx/comment-page-7/#comment-1847</link>
		<dc:creator>Alvin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jun 2010 13:27:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://desktoplinuxreviews.com/?p=1483#comment-1847</guid>
		<description>I use Ubuntu on a daily basis for almost 3 years now. After reading your review, I was shocked to realise that the Big Square Orange Button in Ubuntu Software Center labelled &quot;Featured Applications&quot; was clickable! Oh My. Now I need to explore Lucid Lynx much more. Thanks for the awesome review of my savior distro.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="comment-toolbar" style="text-align: right"><a href="#comment" onclick="CF_Reply('1847','Alvin'); return false;">Reply</a>  |  <a href="#comment" onclick="CF_Quote('1847','Alvin'); return false;">Quote</a></div><span id="co_1847"><p>I use Ubuntu on a daily basis for almost 3 years now. After reading your review, I was shocked to realise that the Big Square Orange Button in Ubuntu Software Center labelled &#8220;Featured Applications&#8221; was clickable! Oh My. Now I need to explore Lucid Lynx much more. Thanks for the awesome review of my savior distro.</p>
</span>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Max</title>
		<link>http://desktoplinuxreviews.com/2010/04/29/ubuntu-linux-10-04-lucid-lynx/comment-page-7/#comment-1700</link>
		<dc:creator>Max</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jun 2010 22:12:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://desktoplinuxreviews.com/?p=1483#comment-1700</guid>
		<description>I have installed Ubuntu 10.04 and I do like it very much however, today I am using Fedora 13 and this system feels more solid.  Every time I use Ubuntu I get the feeling (after a while) that the whole system seems to be glued together with sticky tape instead, for instance, with Fedora with &quot;nuts and bolts&quot;.  Perhaps a misconception on my part.  Fedora 13 is equally very nice and seems as already said more solid.  I love to have Ubuntu as my main system but something is holding me back and somewhere in my mind I always believe that a distro based on Red Hat is much better.  Am I wrong or right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="comment-toolbar" style="text-align: right"><a href="#comment" onclick="CF_Reply('1700','Max'); return false;">Reply</a>  |  <a href="#comment" onclick="CF_Quote('1700','Max'); return false;">Quote</a></div><span id="co_1700"><p>I have installed Ubuntu 10.04 and I do like it very much however, today I am using Fedora 13 and this system feels more solid.  Every time I use Ubuntu I get the feeling (after a while) that the whole system seems to be glued together with sticky tape instead, for instance, with Fedora with &#8220;nuts and bolts&#8221;.  Perhaps a misconception on my part.  Fedora 13 is equally very nice and seems as already said more solid.  I love to have Ubuntu as my main system but something is holding me back and somewhere in my mind I always believe that a distro based on Red Hat is much better.  Am I wrong or right?</p>
</span>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bas</title>
		<link>http://desktoplinuxreviews.com/2010/04/29/ubuntu-linux-10-04-lucid-lynx/comment-page-6/#comment-1459</link>
		<dc:creator>Bas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 May 2010 18:53:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://desktoplinuxreviews.com/?p=1483#comment-1459</guid>
		<description>Actually adding Flash to a 64bit computer is not so easy. You have to download the Flash 64bit  .so file and add it manually, creating a plugin folder, under home/.mozilla, otherwise you have problems. :sad: The Flash provided by Ubuntu is not working properly on 64bits computers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="comment-toolbar" style="text-align: right"><a href="#comment" onclick="CF_Reply('1459','Bas'); return false;">Reply</a>  |  <a href="#comment" onclick="CF_Quote('1459','Bas'); return false;">Quote</a></div><span id="co_1459"><p>Actually adding Flash to a 64bit computer is not so easy. You have to download the Flash 64bit  .so file and add it manually, creating a plugin folder, under home/.mozilla, otherwise you have problems. <img src='http://desktoplinuxreviews.com/wp-content/plugins/smilies-themer/Nomicons v2.0/sad.png' alt=':sad:' class='wp-smiley' /> The Flash provided by Ubuntu is not working properly on 64bits computers.</p>
</span>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ubuntu Linux 10.04 Review (Lucid Lynx) &#124; JetLib News</title>
		<link>http://desktoplinuxreviews.com/2010/04/29/ubuntu-linux-10-04-lucid-lynx/comment-page-6/#comment-1369</link>
		<dc:creator>Ubuntu Linux 10.04 Review (Lucid Lynx) &#124; JetLib News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 May 2010 06:44:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://desktoplinuxreviews.com/?p=1483#comment-1369</guid>
		<description>[...] open source world has been eagerly anticipating the final release of Ubuntu Linux 10.04, and now it&#8217;s finally here. Canonical has been working extremely hard and it shows in the quality of this [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] open source world has been eagerly anticipating the final release of Ubuntu Linux 10.04, and now it&#8217;s finally here. Canonical has been working extremely hard and it shows in the quality of this [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Gillen</title>
		<link>http://desktoplinuxreviews.com/2010/04/29/ubuntu-linux-10-04-lucid-lynx/comment-page-6/#comment-1342</link>
		<dc:creator>David Gillen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 May 2010 10:40:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://desktoplinuxreviews.com/?p=1483#comment-1342</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been running wow under linux (through wine) for quite some time now. Initially some sound problems, but since 09.10 that fiddling to get it working has gone. I installed 10.04 last night, added wine, and ran the wow.exe on my windows partition and it came up immediately. If you&#039;re primarily a linux user I would suggest you try this. Certainly for me performance is no worse, and at times would seem better. Note: You may need to add the line &#039;SET gxApi &quot;opengl&quot;&#039; to your wtf/Config.wtf file.

Regarding steam, I installed the client and used it to download and run some games (again through wine), and with no problems. I&#039;ll admit they were some older games, I&#039;ll try some of the newer releases and see how I get on over the weekend time permitting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="comment-toolbar" style="text-align: right"><a href="#comment" onclick="CF_Reply('1342','David Gillen'); return false;">Reply</a>  |  <a href="#comment" onclick="CF_Quote('1342','David Gillen'); return false;">Quote</a></div><span id="co_1342"><p>I&#8217;ve been running wow under linux (through wine) for quite some time now. Initially some sound problems, but since 09.10 that fiddling to get it working has gone. I installed 10.04 last night, added wine, and ran the wow.exe on my windows partition and it came up immediately. If you&#8217;re primarily a linux user I would suggest you try this. Certainly for me performance is no worse, and at times would seem better. Note: You may need to add the line &#8216;SET gxApi &#8220;opengl&#8221;&#8216; to your wtf/Config.wtf file.</p>
<p>Regarding steam, I installed the client and used it to download and run some games (again through wine), and with no problems. I&#8217;ll admit they were some older games, I&#8217;ll try some of the newer releases and see how I get on over the weekend time permitting.</p>
</span>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Linux NooB12345</title>
		<link>http://desktoplinuxreviews.com/2010/04/29/ubuntu-linux-10-04-lucid-lynx/comment-page-6/#comment-1318</link>
		<dc:creator>Linux NooB12345</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 May 2010 18:51:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://desktoplinuxreviews.com/?p=1483#comment-1318</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m a Mac user, and I wiped my notebook&#039;s HD clean and installed 10.4 (only, no dual boot).

Personally, I don&#039;t like the window buttons on the left. The color scheme is too &quot;OS X.&quot; It&#039;s a good step in the right direction (from that horrid brown), but I want to see Ubuntu find it&#039;s own style.

Overall, 10.4 just feels comfortable to use, I like it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="comment-toolbar" style="text-align: right"><a href="#comment" onclick="CF_Reply('1318','Linux NooB12345'); return false;">Reply</a>  |  <a href="#comment" onclick="CF_Quote('1318','Linux NooB12345'); return false;">Quote</a></div><span id="co_1318"><p>I&#8217;m a Mac user, and I wiped my notebook&#8217;s HD clean and installed 10.4 (only, no dual boot).</p>
<p>Personally, I don&#8217;t like the window buttons on the left. The color scheme is too &#8220;OS X.&#8221; It&#8217;s a good step in the right direction (from that horrid brown), but I want to see Ubuntu find it&#8217;s own style.</p>
<p>Overall, 10.4 just feels comfortable to use, I like it!</p>
</span>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brwn</title>
		<link>http://desktoplinuxreviews.com/2010/04/29/ubuntu-linux-10-04-lucid-lynx/comment-page-6/#comment-1306</link>
		<dc:creator>Brwn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 May 2010 13:30:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://desktoplinuxreviews.com/?p=1483#comment-1306</guid>
		<description>I agree this version of Ubuntu is good, I run it and like it, but this,

&quot;Having them on the left just feels so natural once you get used to it.&quot;
Buttons that is... yeah, and having them on the right all your computing life feels even more natural. I guess if one loses a limb, that too feels natural once one gets used to it. What kind of an argument is that? Why should anyone get used to something they don&#039;t want?

If you&#039;re going to dig up that controversy from its grave and defend the stupid decision, at least make a real argument in its favor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="comment-toolbar" style="text-align: right"><a href="#comment" onclick="CF_Reply('1306','Brwn'); return false;">Reply</a>  |  <a href="#comment" onclick="CF_Quote('1306','Brwn'); return false;">Quote</a></div><span id="co_1306"><p>I agree this version of Ubuntu is good, I run it and like it, but this,</p>
<p>&#8220;Having them on the left just feels so natural once you get used to it.&#8221;<br />
Buttons that is&#8230; yeah, and having them on the right all your computing life feels even more natural. I guess if one loses a limb, that too feels natural once one gets used to it. What kind of an argument is that? Why should anyone get used to something they don&#8217;t want?</p>
<p>If you&#8217;re going to dig up that controversy from its grave and defend the stupid decision, at least make a real argument in its favor.</p>
</span>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: monkey</title>
		<link>http://desktoplinuxreviews.com/2010/04/29/ubuntu-linux-10-04-lucid-lynx/comment-page-6/#comment-1301</link>
		<dc:creator>monkey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 May 2010 11:03:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://desktoplinuxreviews.com/?p=1483#comment-1301</guid>
		<description>Nice review, I&#039;m very excited for Lucid Lynx!

OT: Steam is a horrendous beast. Even if you own original discs, it *still* needs to decrypt game files via the net. For 3rd-world connectivity this blows, hard. I can&#039;t even play the game I paid for. 

Ubuntu, please stay away from close-minded, closed-sourced, nazi-platforms like Steam! Keep our options free, freedom of choice is everything.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="comment-toolbar" style="text-align: right"><a href="#comment" onclick="CF_Reply('1301','monkey'); return false;">Reply</a>  |  <a href="#comment" onclick="CF_Quote('1301','monkey'); return false;">Quote</a></div><span id="co_1301"><p>Nice review, I&#8217;m very excited for Lucid Lynx!</p>
<p>OT: Steam is a horrendous beast. Even if you own original discs, it *still* needs to decrypt game files via the net. For 3rd-world connectivity this blows, hard. I can&#8217;t even play the game I paid for. </p>
<p>Ubuntu, please stay away from close-minded, closed-sourced, nazi-platforms like Steam! Keep our options free, freedom of choice is everything.</p>
</span>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ray hartman</title>
		<link>http://desktoplinuxreviews.com/2010/04/29/ubuntu-linux-10-04-lucid-lynx/comment-page-6/#comment-1278</link>
		<dc:creator>ray hartman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 May 2010 17:39:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://desktoplinuxreviews.com/?p=1483#comment-1278</guid>
		<description>Pretty amazing ... LL_10.04 is practically without issue. Out of the starting gate! On beefy desktop kit I&#039;ve been using x64_LL since beta-1 and never found the 1st gotcha. I look forward to three-years of effortless bullet_proof OS performance.

Too much to ask for even one (1) native_Linux killer usrland app eh ...?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="comment-toolbar" style="text-align: right"><a href="#comment" onclick="CF_Reply('1278','ray hartman'); return false;">Reply</a>  |  <a href="#comment" onclick="CF_Quote('1278','ray hartman'); return false;">Quote</a></div><span id="co_1278"><p>Pretty amazing &#8230; LL_10.04 is practically without issue. Out of the starting gate! On beefy desktop kit I&#8217;ve been using x64_LL since beta-1 and never found the 1st gotcha. I look forward to three-years of effortless bullet_proof OS performance.</p>
<p>Too much to ask for even one (1) native_Linux killer usrland app eh &#8230;?</p>
</span>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ForeverNoob</title>
		<link>http://desktoplinuxreviews.com/2010/04/29/ubuntu-linux-10-04-lucid-lynx/comment-page-6/#comment-1275</link>
		<dc:creator>ForeverNoob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 May 2010 04:05:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://desktoplinuxreviews.com/?p=1483#comment-1275</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the nice review. For wallpaper cycling see here: https://help.ubuntu.com/community/WallpaperTray</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="comment-toolbar" style="text-align: right"><a href="#comment" onclick="CF_Reply('1275','ForeverNoob'); return false;">Reply</a>  |  <a href="#comment" onclick="CF_Quote('1275','ForeverNoob'); return false;">Quote</a></div><span id="co_1275"><p>Thanks for the nice review. For wallpaper cycling see here: <a href="https://help.ubuntu.com/community/WallpaperTray">https://help.ubuntu.com/community/WallpaperTray</a></p>
</span>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tlmck</title>
		<link>http://desktoplinuxreviews.com/2010/04/29/ubuntu-linux-10-04-lucid-lynx/comment-page-6/#comment-1274</link>
		<dc:creator>tlmck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 May 2010 00:44:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://desktoplinuxreviews.com/?p=1483#comment-1274</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;@ &lt;a href=&quot;#comment-1238&quot; title=&quot;Go to comment of this author&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Stewart&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt;:
@Clif, yes your ATI cards will work out of box.

With 3D ATI drivers?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="comment-toolbar" style="text-align: right"><a href="#comment" onclick="CF_Reply('1274','tlmck'); return false;">Reply</a>  |  <a href="#comment" onclick="CF_Quote('1274','tlmck'); return false;">Quote</a></div><span id="co_1274"><p><b>@ <a href="#comment-1238" title="Go to comment of this author">Stewart</a></b>:<br />
@Clif, yes your ATI cards will work out of box.</p>
<p>With 3D ATI drivers?</p>
</span>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tlmck</title>
		<link>http://desktoplinuxreviews.com/2010/04/29/ubuntu-linux-10-04-lucid-lynx/comment-page-6/#comment-1273</link>
		<dc:creator>tlmck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 May 2010 00:38:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://desktoplinuxreviews.com/?p=1483#comment-1273</guid>
		<description>Great upgrade Canonical! Ubuntu went from being just ugly to butt ugly. Thank goodness for sites like gnome-look.org.

Better yet, they could study a distro like PCLinuxOS 2010-Gnome to see how it is really done. http://pclinuxos.com/?page_id=184</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="comment-toolbar" style="text-align: right"><a href="#comment" onclick="CF_Reply('1273','tlmck'); return false;">Reply</a>  |  <a href="#comment" onclick="CF_Quote('1273','tlmck'); return false;">Quote</a></div><span id="co_1273"><p>Great upgrade Canonical! Ubuntu went from being just ugly to butt ugly. Thank goodness for sites like gnome-look.org.</p>
<p>Better yet, they could study a distro like PCLinuxOS 2010-Gnome to see how it is really done. <a href="http://pclinuxos.com/?page_id=184">http://pclinuxos.com/?page_id=184</a></p>
</span>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nomasteryoda</title>
		<link>http://desktoplinuxreviews.com/2010/04/29/ubuntu-linux-10-04-lucid-lynx/comment-page-5/#comment-1269</link>
		<dc:creator>nomasteryoda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Apr 2010 18:20:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://desktoplinuxreviews.com/?p=1483#comment-1269</guid>
		<description>Joost,

I wish this was easier to do like it used to be for KDE 3.5.x... 

You could also use this python script to add in other images and update the xml file automagically. Of course this either needs to be run as root, or you have to change the permissions of the /usr/share/backgrounds/cosmos.

Our very own 11yr-old programmer in our LUG created this when I simply asked if it could be done. Simply put the new images into that folder and run the script... The contents of the script are between the ------ .

Jeff

------------------------------------------------------------
import os

dir = &quot;/usr/share/backgrounds/cosmos/&quot;

print &quot;&quot;&quot;
  
    2009
    08
    04
    00
    00
    00
  
&lt;!-- This animation will start at midnight. --&gt;&quot;&quot;&quot;

files = [f for f in os.listdir(dir) if f.endswith(&#039;.jpg&#039;)]
files.append(files[0])
for i in range(len(files)-1):
	cur = dir + files[i]
	next = dir + files[i+1]
	print &quot;&quot;&quot;  
    1795.0
    %s
  
  
    5.0
    %s
    %s
  &quot;&quot;&quot; % (cur, cur, next)

print &quot;&quot;
---------------------------------------------------------</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="comment-toolbar" style="text-align: right"><a href="#comment" onclick="CF_Reply('1269','nomasteryoda'); return false;">Reply</a>  |  <a href="#comment" onclick="CF_Quote('1269','nomasteryoda'); return false;">Quote</a></div><span id="co_1269"><p>Joost,</p>
<p>I wish this was easier to do like it used to be for KDE 3.5.x&#8230; </p>
<p>You could also use this python script to add in other images and update the xml file automagically. Of course this either needs to be run as root, or you have to change the permissions of the /usr/share/backgrounds/cosmos.</p>
<p>Our very own 11yr-old programmer in our LUG created this when I simply asked if it could be done. Simply put the new images into that folder and run the script&#8230; The contents of the script are between the &#8212;&#8212; .</p>
<p>Jeff</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;<br />
import os</p>
<p>dir = &#8220;/usr/share/backgrounds/cosmos/&#8221;</p>
<p>print &#8220;&#8221;"</p>
<p>    2009<br />
    08<br />
    04<br />
    00<br />
    00<br />
    00</p>
<p><!-- This animation will start at midnight. -->&#8220;&#8221;"</p>
<p>files = [f for f in os.listdir(dir) if f.endswith('.jpg')]<br />
files.append(files[0])<br />
for i in range(len(files)-1):<br />
	cur = dir + files[i]<br />
	next = dir + files[i+1]<br />
	print &#8220;&#8221;"<br />
    1795.0<br />
    %s</p>
<p>    5.0<br />
    %s<br />
    %s<br />
  &#8220;&#8221;" % (cur, cur, next)</p>
<p>print &#8220;&#8221;<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;</p>
</span>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pete</title>
		<link>http://desktoplinuxreviews.com/2010/04/29/ubuntu-linux-10-04-lucid-lynx/comment-page-5/#comment-1268</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Apr 2010 17:57:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://desktoplinuxreviews.com/?p=1483#comment-1268</guid>
		<description>I have to laugh at your video screen shot you chose for flash video running on Youtube.  Seriously.  Polar Bear eating a Seal?  What a choice, and its barely even visible.  LOL!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="comment-toolbar" style="text-align: right"><a href="#comment" onclick="CF_Reply('1268','Pete'); return false;">Reply</a>  |  <a href="#comment" onclick="CF_Quote('1268','Pete'); return false;">Quote</a></div><span id="co_1268"><p>I have to laugh at your video screen shot you chose for flash video running on Youtube.  Seriously.  Polar Bear eating a Seal?  What a choice, and its barely even visible.  LOL!!!</p>
</span>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jalcradus</title>
		<link>http://desktoplinuxreviews.com/2010/04/29/ubuntu-linux-10-04-lucid-lynx/comment-page-5/#comment-1267</link>
		<dc:creator>jalcradus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Apr 2010 17:35:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://desktoplinuxreviews.com/?p=1483#comment-1267</guid>
		<description>Ubuntu is OK but I&#039;ve always liked Linux Mint (which is based on Ubuntu) better, mostly due to the way they handle patented software.  I haven&#039;t tried version 10.04 yet but with previous versions of Ububtu, things like audio and video codecs had to be installed manually.  The instructions for doing this, which are on Ubuntu&#039;s help site, are difficult for most beginners to do and sometimes still don&#039;t work.  With Linux Mint, you have a choice when downloading whether you want to have these included or not.  If you download the file that includes them, then all audio, video, flash, Java, etc. work without having to install anything else.  This is a much better solution.  Linux Mint also includes many other improvements over Ubuntu.  Give it a try!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="comment-toolbar" style="text-align: right"><a href="#comment" onclick="CF_Reply('1267','jalcradus'); return false;">Reply</a>  |  <a href="#comment" onclick="CF_Quote('1267','jalcradus'); return false;">Quote</a></div><span id="co_1267"><p>Ubuntu is OK but I&#8217;ve always liked Linux Mint (which is based on Ubuntu) better, mostly due to the way they handle patented software.  I haven&#8217;t tried version 10.04 yet but with previous versions of Ububtu, things like audio and video codecs had to be installed manually.  The instructions for doing this, which are on Ubuntu&#8217;s help site, are difficult for most beginners to do and sometimes still don&#8217;t work.  With Linux Mint, you have a choice when downloading whether you want to have these included or not.  If you download the file that includes them, then all audio, video, flash, Java, etc. work without having to install anything else.  This is a much better solution.  Linux Mint also includes many other improvements over Ubuntu.  Give it a try!</p>
</span>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karen</title>
		<link>http://desktoplinuxreviews.com/2010/04/29/ubuntu-linux-10-04-lucid-lynx/comment-page-5/#comment-1266</link>
		<dc:creator>Karen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Apr 2010 16:20:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://desktoplinuxreviews.com/?p=1483#comment-1266</guid>
		<description>I think Ubuntu 10.04 is getting to be a sexier OS. Love the new look and feel.  Still don&#039;t care for GRUB (delayed the release because of a bug). I would like to see chameleon in 10.10 Ubuntu release and show them Mac folk an OS cam be sexy and work well too. :heart: :kissing:</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="comment-toolbar" style="text-align: right"><a href="#comment" onclick="CF_Reply('1266','Karen'); return false;">Reply</a>  |  <a href="#comment" onclick="CF_Quote('1266','Karen'); return false;">Quote</a></div><span id="co_1266"><p>I think Ubuntu 10.04 is getting to be a sexier OS. Love the new look and feel.  Still don&#8217;t care for GRUB (delayed the release because of a bug). I would like to see chameleon in 10.10 Ubuntu release and show them Mac folk an OS cam be sexy and work well too. <img src='http://desktoplinuxreviews.com/wp-content/plugins/smilies-themer/Nomicons v2.0/heart.png' alt=':heart:' class='wp-smiley' /> <img src='http://desktoplinuxreviews.com/wp-content/plugins/smilies-themer/Nomicons v2.0/kissing.png' alt=':kissing:' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
</span>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob_Jones</title>
		<link>http://desktoplinuxreviews.com/2010/04/29/ubuntu-linux-10-04-lucid-lynx/comment-page-5/#comment-1265</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob_Jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Apr 2010 14:25:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://desktoplinuxreviews.com/?p=1483#comment-1265</guid>
		<description>Ubuntu 10.04 looks terrible.  If I wanted OSX I would spent the money on a Mac.  I think I will either stick with Ubuntu 9.10-which has recently been giving me performance problems for an unexplained reason- or move to Debian.  I especially hate my buttons on the far left.  

Bob_Jones</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="comment-toolbar" style="text-align: right"><a href="#comment" onclick="CF_Reply('1265','Bob_Jones'); return false;">Reply</a>  |  <a href="#comment" onclick="CF_Quote('1265','Bob_Jones'); return false;">Quote</a></div><span id="co_1265"><p>Ubuntu 10.04 looks terrible.  If I wanted OSX I would spent the money on a Mac.  I think I will either stick with Ubuntu 9.10-which has recently been giving me performance problems for an unexplained reason- or move to Debian.  I especially hate my buttons on the far left.  </p>
<p>Bob_Jones</p>
</span>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Ubuntu 10.04 review post &#124; Ubuntu-News - Your one stop for news about Ubuntu</title>
		<link>http://desktoplinuxreviews.com/2010/04/29/ubuntu-linux-10-04-lucid-lynx/comment-page-5/#comment-1264</link>
		<dc:creator>The Ubuntu 10.04 review post &#124; Ubuntu-News - Your one stop for news about Ubuntu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Apr 2010 14:24:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://desktoplinuxreviews.com/?p=1483#comment-1264</guid>
		<description>[...] DesktopLinux: Ubuntu Linux 10.04 (Lucid Lynx) The open source world has been eagerly anticipating the final release of Ubuntu Linux 10.04, and now it’s finally here. Canonical has been working extremely hard and it shows in the quality of this release. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] DesktopLinux: Ubuntu Linux 10.04 (Lucid Lynx) The open source world has been eagerly anticipating the final release of Ubuntu Linux 10.04, and now it’s finally here. Canonical has been working extremely hard and it shows in the quality of this release. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HK</title>
		<link>http://desktoplinuxreviews.com/2010/04/29/ubuntu-linux-10-04-lucid-lynx/comment-page-5/#comment-1263</link>
		<dc:creator>HK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Apr 2010 11:19:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://desktoplinuxreviews.com/?p=1483#comment-1263</guid>
		<description>Wow... as soon as I began reading the article I knew you were an Apple fanboi. If you like Apple that much, use Apple computers. Linux users want Linux, not OSX. Moving the buttons to the left side of the window is a TERRIBLE &quot;improvement&quot; and I think there will be a lot of complaints... 
At least try to be objective... I think every page had some comparison to OSX or Apple. You&#039;re supposed to be reviewing Ubuntu, not furthering Apple&#039;s propaganda machine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="comment-toolbar" style="text-align: right"><a href="#comment" onclick="CF_Reply('1263','HK'); return false;">Reply</a>  |  <a href="#comment" onclick="CF_Quote('1263','HK'); return false;">Quote</a></div><span id="co_1263"><p>Wow&#8230; as soon as I began reading the article I knew you were an Apple fanboi. If you like Apple that much, use Apple computers. Linux users want Linux, not OSX. Moving the buttons to the left side of the window is a TERRIBLE &#8220;improvement&#8221; and I think there will be a lot of complaints&#8230;<br />
At least try to be objective&#8230; I think every page had some comparison to OSX or Apple. You&#8217;re supposed to be reviewing Ubuntu, not furthering Apple&#8217;s propaganda machine.</p>
</span>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://desktoplinuxreviews.com/2010/04/29/ubuntu-linux-10-04-lucid-lynx/comment-page-5/#comment-1262</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Apr 2010 07:55:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://desktoplinuxreviews.com/?p=1483#comment-1262</guid>
		<description>RavenHeart: Whether it&#039;s Gnome/Linux/Canonical&#039;s fault is irrelevant as far as the user is concerned. The point is the screensaver and wallpaper settings should be in the same place - that&#039;s just common sense. The fact that they&#039;re not is confusing to an end user regardless, and the reviewer rightly points this out. For Linux to ever stand a chance of succeeding on the desktop (and to me it still seems a LONG way off being able to do that), it&#039;s points like this that need to be addressed regardless of any technical or historical reasons.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="comment-toolbar" style="text-align: right"><a href="#comment" onclick="CF_Reply('1262','Chris'); return false;">Reply</a>  |  <a href="#comment" onclick="CF_Quote('1262','Chris'); return false;">Quote</a></div><span id="co_1262"><p>RavenHeart: Whether it&#8217;s Gnome/Linux/Canonical&#8217;s fault is irrelevant as far as the user is concerned. The point is the screensaver and wallpaper settings should be in the same place &#8211; that&#8217;s just common sense. The fact that they&#8217;re not is confusing to an end user regardless, and the reviewer rightly points this out. For Linux to ever stand a chance of succeeding on the desktop (and to me it still seems a LONG way off being able to do that), it&#8217;s points like this that need to be addressed regardless of any technical or historical reasons.</p>
</span>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dyinman</title>
		<link>http://desktoplinuxreviews.com/2010/04/29/ubuntu-linux-10-04-lucid-lynx/comment-page-5/#comment-1261</link>
		<dc:creator>dyinman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Apr 2010 06:32:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://desktoplinuxreviews.com/?p=1483#comment-1261</guid>
		<description>A few things. First, a question: do you want to use OSX or do you want to use Ubuntu? Because it seems like you think everything should be the way OSX does it (I respectfully but very strongly disagree). Since they changed the button placement, it&#039;s easy to change back with some Googling but beyond that it&#039;d be swell to have a tool to easily switch back as I  prefer the buttons on the right.

A minor correction: you can cycle wallpapers in a folder. In fact, you can make them do very nice transitions. However, this isn&#039;t (as far as I know) easy to configure, at least there&#039;s nothing GUI to do it. I&#039;m not sure since what version of Gnome you were able to do this, but it&#039;s been a little while at least.

Lastly, the only thing this took after Mac was the button placement (which I dislike). Sharing a similar base color doesn&#039;t mean anything. Beyond color, the default wallpapers and theme isn&#039;t even close.

In closing, I know a lot of people love their OSX (which is fine), and a lot of people like their Windows (also fine). I don&#039;t like either, so I don&#039;t feel like it&#039;s a great direction to start proclaiming that Linux Desktop should be more like Operating System A or Operating System B in their default installs. Reviewing the latest Ubuntu release should be judged by itself and not constantly being compared to how OSX does things.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="comment-toolbar" style="text-align: right"><a href="#comment" onclick="CF_Reply('1261','dyinman'); return false;">Reply</a>  |  <a href="#comment" onclick="CF_Quote('1261','dyinman'); return false;">Quote</a></div><span id="co_1261"><p>A few things. First, a question: do you want to use OSX or do you want to use Ubuntu? Because it seems like you think everything should be the way OSX does it (I respectfully but very strongly disagree). Since they changed the button placement, it&#8217;s easy to change back with some Googling but beyond that it&#8217;d be swell to have a tool to easily switch back as I  prefer the buttons on the right.</p>
<p>A minor correction: you can cycle wallpapers in a folder. In fact, you can make them do very nice transitions. However, this isn&#8217;t (as far as I know) easy to configure, at least there&#8217;s nothing GUI to do it. I&#8217;m not sure since what version of Gnome you were able to do this, but it&#8217;s been a little while at least.</p>
<p>Lastly, the only thing this took after Mac was the button placement (which I dislike). Sharing a similar base color doesn&#8217;t mean anything. Beyond color, the default wallpapers and theme isn&#8217;t even close.</p>
<p>In closing, I know a lot of people love their OSX (which is fine), and a lot of people like their Windows (also fine). I don&#8217;t like either, so I don&#8217;t feel like it&#8217;s a great direction to start proclaiming that Linux Desktop should be more like Operating System A or Operating System B in their default installs. Reviewing the latest Ubuntu release should be judged by itself and not constantly being compared to how OSX does things.</p>
</span>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced

Served from: desktoplinuxreviews.com @ 2012-02-11 20:47:14 -->
