Parsix Linux 2.0

With dramatic events in Iran moving at light speed, I thought it might be interesting to kick off the new blog with a look at Parsix Linux. Parsix Linux is a Gnome-centric distribution created in Iran and based on KANOTIX and Debian. I downloaded it a while back but never quite had time to get a review done for ExtremeTech while I was working there.

Alan Baghumian
Alan Baghumian

The developer of Parsix is Alan Baghumian, a native Iranian. Distrowatch had a good interview with him recently where he talks about why and how Parsix Linux was born and how it differs from KANOTIX:

DW: Parsix has been in development for over a year. How does it differ from KANOTIX and what are its main features? Who is the target market?

AB: Parsix and KANOTIX are very similar. Both of them are based on Debian “sid” and Parsix GNU/Linux uses KANOTIX’s configuration scripts and kernel in live mode. Our aim is to provide a simple, stable, clean and up-to-date desktop operating system for “newbie” users. The main differences are:

* KANOTIX is a KDE-centric distribution, while Parsix uses GNOME.
* They use different installation systems. KANOTIX’s installation system is a QT-based application, while Parsix uses a classic installation system written in Bash.
* A completely different package selection.
* Documentation. We try to provide documentation for new users. Currently, the starter and installation guides have been completed and the English edition of the starter guide will be ready soon. We are planning to add much more Persian and English documentation in the future.
* Parsix GNU/Linux uses Debian’s standard kernels as the default kernel after hard disk installation. It is optimised for i686 or K7, depending on system’s CPU.
* Parsix GNU/Linux is optimised to be used on the i686 processors family. This gives better performance for desktop usage.
* Pre-configured applications for Persian language, such as text input,, UTF-8 locale, etc.
* KANOTIX has editions for 32-bit and 64-bit processors. Currently, Parsix offers a 32-bit edition only.
* We try to minimise the use non-free software in Parsix.

It’s well worth a read and it seems clear that Alan is doing some great things in Iran by bringing Linux to the Iranian people.

Parsix Linux is a Live CD so you have the option whether or not to install it. I figured I’d try it in VMWare just for the heck of it and, unfortunately, I could not get it to install. It’s install routine seems somewhat primitive in comparison to other distributions. I got stuck trying to get the disk partition to work via GParted.

While it’s unfortunate the install didn’t work properly, I was still able to run Parsix as a Live CD with no problems. The default language is english not persian. So there was no problem reading anything while using Parsix. If I’d been installing on an actual computer instead of a virtual machine I might have had better luck with it.

And just to clarify for those who might be wondering, Parsix Linux is not an Islamic distribution. It does not contain overt religious imagery, prayer apps or anything similar to what you’d find in the Muslim edition of Ubuntu (Sabily). I just wanted to mention that since some might assume otherwise because it’s made in the Islamic Republic of Iran.

The Parsix Desktop & Apps
Since Parsix uses Gnome you’ll feel right at home if you’re a Gnome person. The desktop comes with wallpaper of a rather attractive orange-ish flower. I am not sure if this some kind of Iranian flower or something. It’s not clear what it’s supposed to be or if there if there is some kind of symbolism to it. It may just be a pretty flower but after doing my last review for ET about Ubuntu Satanic Edition, I’m seeing potential symbolism everywhere. Heh, heh.

Parsix Desktop
In terms of apps, Parsix provides a pretty good range and you can also install more if you want. Here’s a list of some of what you’ll find with this distribution:

Gnome FTP Client

Pages: 1 | 2

3 thoughts on “Parsix Linux 2.0

  1. Jim, I had always heard good things about Parsix. You may remember Melloe from WAY back. He tried it out not too long ago and had very good results – he has all kinds of hardware from his days running "The Club". Anyway, I've tried it once or twice over the years, but since it is GNOME based and I prefer KDE and XFCE, and also since I already have a good collection of Debian based distributions, I passed on this one. I do have reason to believe that installing it through convention means would be likely to achieve different and more positive results.

Leave a Reply