Fedora 14 KDE

In my last look at Fedora 14, I covered the GNOME version. Fedora comes in other flavors though, including a KDE version. Since there are many KDE users out there, I thought it wise to cover the KDE release. Please note that I’ve skipped doing a video review for this release, but you can watch the review for the GNOME version though.

KDE has been updated to version 4.5 in this release. See the KDE 4.5 release announcement. If you aren’t familiar with what it has to offer desktop users.

Here’s a brief sample of what KDE 4.5 has to offer on the desktop:

Notification area cleanup
KWin upgrade
Plasma Activity Manager
Better Workspace controls

Live CD Desktop
Live CD Desktop

What’s New In This Release
Here’s a sample of the new features in this release:

Spice – Spice aims to provide a complete open source solution for interaction with virtualized desktops and provides high-quality remote access to QEMU virtual machines.

Mobility options – This release includes software from the MeeGo™ project which is designed to support platforms such as netbooks, nettops, and various embedded devices.

Amazon EC2 – For the first time since Fedora 8, Fedora will release on the EC2 cloud.

D Compiler – Support for D, a systems programming language. Its focus is on combining the power and high performance of C and C++ with the programmer productivity of modern languages like Ruby and Python.

Some other features include:
Updating Perl to version 5.12, Python to version 2.7, Boost to version 1.44, Netbeans to version 6.9, KDE to version 4.5, Eclipse to the Helios Release, and Sugar to version 0.90.

As with the GNOME version, most of this stuff is geared toward administrators or programmers rather than average desktop users.

Hardware Requirements & Installation

Hardware Requirements
Here’s what you’ll need to run this distro:

Processor and memory requirements for x86 Architectures

The following CPU specifications are stated in terms of Intel processors. Other processors, such as those from AMD, Cyrix, and VIA that are compatible with and equivalent to the following Intel processors, may also be used with Fedora. Fedora 14 requires an Intel Pentium Pro or better processor, and is optimized for i686 and later processors.

Recommended for text-mode: 200 MHz Pentium Pro or better

Pages: First | 1 | 2 | 3 | . . . | Next | Last

18 thoughts on “Fedora 14 KDE

  1. I installed Fedora 15 Beta tonight to check out the new GNOME 3 Shell interface. It actually seemed to work pretty well and it was responsive, but the user interface isn't exactly my style; for me, it required too many mouse clicks to navigate. Fedora, however, did a nice job with it, and if the Beta is any indication, this will be a solid release when it comes out in May. Still, for me, I would probably prefer to use one of the other spins: KDE, Xfce, or LXDE, all of which are also available.

    Meanwhile, Fedora 14, now released for a few months, ought to be a bit more stable and less volatile for every day use, but I was at least favorably impressed with the overall quality of the Beta testing in Fedora 15 so far.

  2. I just install Fedora 14 KDE and not quite impress with it. First of all about the updates. It took me until still doesn't get how can update it. Always popup saying that that waiting for other package manager etc. Can somebody explain me how to kill the yum before as it block my way to use other updates.

    I'm confused by that. It is much more easy with Ubuntu. Also where the heck is this repository? Still searching now.

    Best regards,

    I wong

  3. Running Fedora 14 KDE from Live USB at the moment and I'm really impressed with it's speed and ease of use. I'd always steered clear of Fedora as I'd heard that it wasn't particulary suitable for beginners (though after a few years of running nothing but linux, I guess I'm not a beginner any more).

    I have Mint 10 gnome installed as my main OS and tried KDE recently. KDE didn't perform well on my system so I'm looking for a new distro/DE. Fedora KDE and OpenSuse 11.4 both look good candidates :)

  4. OtterNz, if you happen to come by… the ATI Catalyst™ 10.11 Proprietary Linux x86 Display Driver did the trick for me. Fedora is now fast, enjoyable, and no bugs i've had to worry about (besides the suspend command).

  5. @ KookieMonster:

    What version did you get from the website? 10.12? 64bit? I much prefer to use yum, but I might look into the one from the website since it's solved your problems (Although my method works, it bugs the hell out of me having to do it every time I shut down or reboot)

    I think if you use the one from the website you can have problems when xorg is updated, there is a guide somewhere on what to do when updating xorg when using the drivers from the website. You might also be able to get around it by using -x to exclude the xorg packages during an update.

  6. @OtterNZ: thank your for the comments :). I managed to install the drivers from the AMD site (despite a fedora faq strongly advising against it). You just need to add a few librairies before, as written below their download link. Maybe one or two extra dependencies (sorry I forgot), but worked like a charm for me. Compiz and 3D work fine now.

  7. Good review here Jim.

    My personal experience with Fedora has been quite good, but I definitely agree with the "Intermediate to advanced" users part. I switched to Fedora when 13 came out, after years of using debian only systems (mainly KDE ones since that's my preference). sidux was the distro that had my hooked, but Fedora suits my needs better, ie I want the latest stable versions of my programmes without the hassle of fixing breaks in a rolling release.

    There is an issue which I consider more major: On Fedora 14, there seems to be a problem with kwin (desktop effects) and the proprietary ATI drivers. I find I have to boot with effects disabled, and enable them once logged in, otherwise KDE freezes and I have to boot in failsafe mode.

    @Shitalkumar – That's unfortunate that networking doesn't work for you out of the box. It may be worth reporting it on the forums to get help, or so it can be looked into as a bug. Internet connection works out of the box for almost all, and networking with windows computers normally just requires setting the correct samba permissions in selinux.

    @Bill Julian – The rpmfusion free and non-free repositories are a must have for any Fedora user (similar to debian non-free etc), they contain all the codecs etc. All you need to do to play audio, avi and wmv is to yum install the required codec packs.

    @KookieMonster – My experience exactly (also ATI 5XXX series), this is also a known problem judging by bug reports. IIRC They haven't got up to the 5XXX series for the open source drivers yet, and the ATI proprietary linux drivers are behind the nVidia ones in quality. If you happen to come back and see this, here is how I get 3D effects with the 5XXX series:

    1) Edit kwinrc making sure things like "OpenGLIsUnsafe=false" etc and that the render type is set to "OpenGL" not "xrender" – This step is enough for some people

    2) log out with desktop effects disabled

    3) Log in

    4) Enable desktop effects, making sure OpenGL is selected.

    5) Let the first "do you want to keep these settings" windows time out after 10 seconds (mine is a blank window, I can click where the buttons should be, but 3D desktop effects go funky if I do)

    6) enable desktop effects the second time, selecting the option for keeping these settings when asked. 3D effects will now all work.

    7) Remember to disable desktop effects before shutting down, or else you will have to use failsafe mode to disable them next time you log in, because kwin will freeze.

    8) repeat the above from number 4 above next time you log in.

    The 3D performance is poor when running kwin on an ATI 5XXX, and that along with the freezing on login is why kwin wont let you run 3D effects without manual over ride.

    3D rendering works like it should for other things e.g. games

    @shahin – 3 main ways.

    1) Download the Fedora 14 KDE spin from http://fedoraproject.org/en/get-fedora-options#de… insert the CD and restart your computer, then from the live CD that has popped up, click the install icon in the top left corner of the screen – follow the on screen instructions from there.

    2) If you already have Fedora 14 installed and you're just asking how to install the actual KDE desktop packages to go along with Gnome etc then open a console and type


    # Enter root password when asked

    yum install @kde-desktop

    # Type "y" without the quotes and hit enter when asked

    Next time you log in, use the drop down session selector on the login screen to choose KDE

  8. Thanks so muck for doing a Fedora KDE review! I started with Ubuntu in 2008 and soon switched to KDE. Most fo the time I've had great luck, until recently.

    I purchased a Dell Vostro i5 Core with the Nvidia 310m hybrid graphics. At the time of purchase the Nvidia card was only a slight increase so I thought, "what the heck!" Well, it's been a nightmare, As many people well know getting the Nvidia Drivers installed on a Linux system can be a major pain in the least. I tried Kubuntu and Kubuntu with upgraded X-org PPA's, OpenSuse, PCLinuxOS, Chakra, and a few others. I tried numerous tips, work arounds and manual installs all to no avail. With all of these I couldn't get that darn Nivida driver working. So, I decided to stick with the built in Intel graphics chip. Kubuntu gave me kernel errors but more important the Intel drivers had and still has a lot of, "video tearing," effects. The others gave me different problems UNTIL FEDORA 14! I was able to install it, use the Intel graphic drivers and the kernel gave me no problems. I must say coming from Debian systems to an RPM system took some getting used to but it wasn't too hard. Setting up the multimedia was fairly easy with the scripts but unfortunately brought in way too much Gnome libraries, etc. It took me a while but now I have a fully working Vostro 3300 system, thanks to great work from the Fedora developers and I'm quite pleased. I'm actually looking forward to Fedora 15 and what they will bring next but for now I'm very content with my stable system.

    Please Fedora keep up the KDE spin, people DO use it!!

  9. hi

    taking you words about "…this distro is probably not well suited for beginners or casual desktop users", it is because of that our main goal in http://openxange.org is to provide a Fedora based disrto to main "normal" users and make the switch from M$ more easy.


  10. Fedora 14 looked like a great solid Fedora for me… but there was a show spoiler at the end… I was unable to use 3D acceleration with the ATI proprietary drivers. The free ones also did not work with my radeon 5xxx. For other users, this is a solid choice (besides a few missing librairies here and there it seems).

  11. You DO have to go to outside repositories, as far as I know, to get Multimedia to work with Fedora. Same goes for any non free firmware.

  12. So you did not need autoten to get multi-media codecs? Interesting.

    I always want to like fedora and it always turns out to be a tempermental nuisance.

    Experienced users who want KDE can do as well or better in other places, not least of which being Suse.

    Debian? There are a number of choices starting with Squeeze/KDE.

    If I want something that won't break every other time I start it (been there with fedora) I would run Mepis 11 Alpha 4 before I would run this thing. And that's an alpha release for Pete's sake.

  13. Well, the review here on Fedora -14 KDE is well described. But how to make network connections is missed up, because i struggled to make one. Actually I installed Fedora-14 both KDE and GNOME versions, in KDE i suppose to make a DSL connection, at first attempt it did not allow me to save the User Name and Password, after Google i understand i have to disable the SE-Linux, which i did it by putting "selinux=0" as kernel argument, but after this it is not showing in the list only "Auto eth0", so for me to get the net i manually have to run "/etc/init.d/network restart", then i get the internet. But in GNOME even now it didn't allow me to get the internet. in Ubuntu/Debian it works by default.

    One more problem/error what i found in KDE is, i installed "yumex" as a fronted for yum, and when i launch it, say no network connection.

    I suppose need some improvement in these sections, because Desktop user after installation first checks for the net connection, and if fedora makes burden to get this easily, then he straight away rejects.

  14. Jim, you mentioned the fact that Fedora asks for account information at the end. That's something they've never changed. I believe that ten years ago when I reviewed Red Hat 7.0 and 7.1 for Extreme Tech, and later the "Skipjack" test release of Red Hat 7.3 for Linux Journal, I remember the same thing. I'd say, for the most part they seem to be using components similar to what was in those installation programs nearly a decade ago. It looks prettier now and it does a lot more, but the structure still has hints from that old installer, and that might be one of the reasons that it isn't any better streamlined.

    The Ubuntu camp has definitely set the bar high in this particular area; they definitely have the most streamlined installation process. Debian has greatly improved, but you can see a lot of the same serial steps in Debian that show up in Fedora – it is an easy install in both Fedora and Debian, but Fedora could be a little better organized, and Debian could still stand even a bit more improvement in this regard.

  15. Well, you got this one reviewed just in the nick of time there Jim! It won't be long and Fedora 15 will be coming out! :-)

    Personally, I installed Fedora 14 just about a week before it was released so that I could beat the rush, and I ran it once or twice a week for about a month. It did everything I asked it to do. It was solid, definitely the most solid Fedora release I have ever used. Linux User & Developer have, in issue 94, a review, of which you can see part at http://www.linuxuser.co.uk/reviews/fedora-14-revi

    Linux Format issue LXF138 has a cute gimmick: Some of their issues have a Ubuntu Purple on the front; sone of their issues have the Fedora Blue on the front, and these two are the featured distributions. LXF broke their review down into several categories, each on a ten point scale. This showed exactly where the two systems are strong (Fedora 14 and Ubuntu 10.10):

    Both Fedora and Ubuntu got 9 out of 10 points for Installation.

    Fedora outdid Ubuntu 9 to 8 on a category they called Booting.

    Fedora also outdid Ubuntu 9 to 8 in a category called System.

    Where Ubuntu was strong was the desktop, and it got a full 10 points compared to 8 for Fedora. But Fedora, as I've mentioned before, is really strong in Virtualization, and it got 10 points and Ubuntu got 9.

    Both are pretty solid, as you can tell from the numbers. Ubuntu is a bit more of an "ease of use" system, with a great desktop experience. Fedora is a great "system" experience, with no lower than a nine in three categories pertaining to the system experience: the installation, the system tools, and the booting experience, and it was considered near perfect in its real strength, virtualization.

    I recommend that really interested readers go pick up a copy of the LXF 138 issue of Linux Format. They call it the December issue, but it's been out a while now.

Leave a Reply